Grass roots events and actions

Amid new Iranian threat, Israel connects to America’s Ballistic Missile Early Warning System

Exclusive: DEBKA http://www.debka.com
April 15, 2008, 12:36 PM (GMT+02:00)
The 12th Space Warning Squadron, Greenland

Israel requested the hook-up to the BMEWS for early warning to defend itself against Iranian missile attack. Tuesday, April 15, Iran’s deputy C-in-C Mohammad Reza Ashtiani threatened to eliminate Israel from “the scene of the universe” if it launches a military attack on the Islamic state.

DEBKAfile’s military sources report the system operates from three global centers – the US Thule Air Base in Greenland, where the 12th Space Warning Squadron is located; the Clear Air Force Station in Alaska and the British RAF long-range radar station at Fylingdales, Yorkshire, in England.

This is the third time Israel has been connected to the BMEWS. The first was in 1991 before the first Gulf War and the second in 2003 before the US invasion of Iraq. Then, Israel feared Iraqi missile attack, which indeed materialized in 1991. Now, US military sources interpret the request as signifying Israel’s sense of the need to prepare for an Iranian missile attack in the not-too-distant future.

If the U.S. is ultimately leaving Iraq, why is the military building 'permanent' bases?

If the U.S. is ultimately leaving Iraq, why is the military building 'permanent' bases?

Primary Source: GlobalSecurity.org

Initially, the US established more than a hundred bases of different sizes in Iraq. By the end of 2003, the Pentagon had developed as many as fourteen bases beyond the level of temporary encampment. According to the Iraq Study Group, at the end of 2006 there were still 55 US bases in the country and Pentagon requests for funding in the last year have included money for building giant mess halls – capable of feeding 5000 people – new airfields, and other facilities that suggest the U.S. isn’t planning to leave Iraq anytime soon. Below are some of the key facilities and mega-bases.

The Costs Are Many----Prepared by the Peace & Social Concerns Committee of Princeton Friends Meeting 3/24/08

The Costs Are Many

4,000 US Military Killed(1a)

29,320 US Military wounded – direct hostilities(1b)
62,650 US Military wounded – indirect, accident, disease(1b)
81,174 to 88,585(2a) to 1,185,800(2b) Iraqis killed
2.3 million Iraqi internally displaced persons(3)
2,012,000 to 2,467,000 Iraqi refugees(3)
1,810 Iraqi refugees admitted to US (fiscal year 06-07)(3)

1 trillion dollars for the first 4 years of the war(4)
3 trillion dollars estimated for the long term costs including taking care
of wounded veterans and interest on debt incurred to borrow money
to pay for the war(4)
$720 million per day = $500,000 per minute(4)
More than $4 billion spent in 2007 for recruiting into the military(5)
Other ways to spend $720 million (a day’s cost of the war) (4) :
16,525 people could get health insurance for one year
423,529 children could get health insurance for one year
95,364 kids could have a year in a Head Start program
1,153,846 kids could get free lunches for a year
34,904 people could go to a state college for 4 years
12,478 teachers could be paid for one year
84 new elementary schools could be built
6,482 new homes could be built
1,274,336 homes could have renewable energy for one year

(1a) Department of Defense has officially confirmed 3,992; 8 more remain to be confirmed.
(1b) Department of Defense, 3/1/08 (Note that the DoD has an unusual way of distinguishing between “hostile” and other types of injuries.)
(1a and b from www.icasualties.org on 3/24/08)
(2a) estimate (1/1/08) given at iraqbodycount.org
(2b) estimate (1/1/08) given at justforeignpolicy.org
(3) UN High Commission on Refugees, 11/21/07 (in Quaker Action Winter 2008, published by the American Friends Service Committee)
(4) For basis of estimates and calculations, see: www.afsc.org/cost/facts-and-figures.htm.
See also 2 minute video “One Day in the Iraq War” at www.afsc.org/cost
(5) www.nationalpriorities.org/charts/Spending-on-Military-Recruiting-2.htm includes advertising, maintaining recruiting stations, pay & benefits for more than 22,000 recruiters, and enlistment bonuses.

US Military Option on Iran Is Back on the Table

US Military Option on Iran Is Back on the Table

DEBKAfile Exclusive Report

March 19, 2008, 2:23 PM (GMT+02:00)
Cheney with US troops at Balad air base, Iraq

Cheney with US troops at Balad air base, Iraq

“Iran has got to be very high on that list,” said a senior aide ahead of the talks US Vice President Dick Cheney will hold during his 10-day tour of the Middle East and Turkey, which began Monday, March 17 in Iraq.

Singling out Oman, the aide noted that the US and Oman are co-guardians of the strategic Strait of Hormuz. “The Omanis, like a lot of other people,” he said “are concerned by the escalating tensions between the rest of the world community and Iran and by some of Iran’s activities, particularly in the nuclear field, but outside its borders as well.”

According to DEBKAfile, the official was referring to Tehran’s meddling in Iraq, Lebanon and the Gaza Strip.

Our military, Washington and Gulf sources report that US Vice President Dick Cheney is again talking about possible US military action to shut down Iran’s covert nuclear program.

Cheney stopped over in Oman Wednesday, Wed. March 19, after two days in Iraq. He will travel next to Saudi Arabia, is due in Jerusalem next Saturday and will also visit Ramallah and Turkey.

Our sources report exclusively that his talks are focusing on two aspects of the Iranian nuclear threat:

1. The Bush administration’s decision to distance itself from the National Intelligence Estimate released last December. Its conclusion that Iran’s nuclear arms program was shelved in 2003, which rendered America’s military option superfluous, is now deemed a mistake.

2. The administration now buys British, German, French and Israeli intelligence estimates that Iran is indeed pressing forward with programs for building nuclear weapons, warheads and ballistic missiles for their delivery.

La casa de la paz---CARLOS FRESNEDA desde Crawford

La casa de la paz
CARLOS FRESNEDA desde Crawford (Texas)
18 de marzo.- Hay una casa allá en Crawford que nada tiene que ver con el rancho. Una casa modesta y blanca, al otro lado de las vías del tren, con una Estatua de la Libertad en el jardín y una bandera de la paz colgada del porche. Con las puertas siempre abiertas a todos los que llegan al corazón de Texas para pedirle al presidente Bush que traiga a las tropas de vuelta y ponga fin a la ocupación de Irak.

Denied Entry--By Starhawk

Denied Entry
By Starhawk

Today is March 16. Five years ago, I was in a small village in the
Occupied Territories of the West Bank of Palestine with a group of
volunteers from the International Solidarity Movement, which supports
nonviolent resistance against the Occupation. We had gone because the
villagers were being menaced by tanks from the Israeli military, and
wanted witnesses, but by the time we arrived, the tanks had gone. Instead
we wandered through the olive groves, studded with pink cyclamen and

Conviction Overturned on Appeal for Camp Casey Protesters

Yesterday, two protesters won the reversal of criminal convictions relating to their activities during a peaceful protest of the Iraq war at Camp Casey I, near the President’s ranch in Crawford, Texas. The protesters, Austin psychologist Dr. Em Hardy and retired attorney and Navy veteran Hiram Myers of Oklahoma, were arrested on April 14, 2006 after they erected the tent between fences on county roads to draw attention to the Iraq war.

“This is a victory for our clients and for the First Amendment,” said Lisa Graybill, Legal Director for the ACLU of Texas. “We are delighted to see justice done in this case.”

Hardy and Myers were arrested for “obstruction of a roadway,” even though the evidence clearly showed, and the appeals court agreed, there was no obstruction whatsoever. The court noted that the “remote possibility” of obstruction is not an adequate basis for arrest.

“The First Amendment means nothing if it does not protect the right to peacefully assemble and protest the actions of the government, whatever one’s viewpoint,” said longtime ACLU cooperating attorney David Broiles, who represented Myers and Hardy pro bono. “Freedom itself is at stake when the government silences those who disagree with its actions.”

“I’m delighted that the criminal conviction I received solely for exercising my First Amendment right to protest has been overturned. I am proud to be a part of a ruling that established a fair interpretation of a statute that could have been used against the constitutional rights of protesters in the future, “stated Hardy.

“The outcome of this case demonstrates that the First Amendment is still alive and well in Crawford, Texas, despite the government’s best efforts to silence us.” Myers agreed.

For more information on the ACLU of Texas, go to www.aclutx.org.

Story of Hope and Reconciliation

Published on Thursday, January 24, 2008 by The Baltimore Sun
End The Occupation - and Get Justice For Its Victims
by Bassam Aramin
This month, President Bush visited the Israeli-occupied West Bank towns of Bethlehem and Ramallah and declared that the occupation must end. These were no doubt welcome words to Palestinians and Israelis alike. They provide hope for peace; for without occupation, peace is truly possible.

Unfortunately, for many, including my 10-year-old daughter Abir, it is too late.

Annual Meeting in Crawford

January 26 2008 The Crawford Texas Peace House will have our annual meeting to discuss Peace presence in Crawford.
Bree Walker the new owner of Camp Casey is making plans to join us to plan our united effort for success in this last Year of Bush's Presidency

10:00 Peace House at for Karma Yoga & house cleaning
12:30 to 1:00 lunch
1:00 to 2:30 meeting
3:00 to 5:00 scrap book party (bring photos)

Give Peace a Chance Get up and Dance

Thanks
Kay
Hadi
Johnny

If you can't make it to the meeting e-mail us your ideas crawfordpeacehouse@gmail.com

Crawford Texas Peace House
9142 E. Fifth St.
Crawford, TX 76638
254-486-0099.

So many issues. How do you choose?

Kay Lucas, guest column Waco Tribune January 19th 2008

Serious attention deficit
So many issues. How do you choose?

Recently, we at the Crawford Peace House hosted a press conference on events in Pakistan and the threat of war with Iran. The event included two Pakistani-American speakers and one Iranian-American.

Our press release focused on a text message received by one of our board of directors, Hadi Jawad, from an aide to former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto. This was weeks before her assassination. Bhutto was attempting to get a message to the president and American people — through us.

Jawad is a Pakistani-American who has lived in the United States for many years. He still has family in Pakistan involved in the recent turmoil, and has close contacts with Bhutto’s aides.

The Crawford Peace House also sent out a notice that there would be a protest on that same day addressing three issues: the Pakistan emergency, U.S. threats to bomb Iran and U.S. use of torture.

We received a phone call from a reporter who expressed incredulity regarding the Bhutto aide’s message to Jawad, and seemed to take issue with our number of issues.

The reporter said the “left” could not seem to focus on one issue at a time and insinuated that the peace movement in Crawford was irrelevant.

Just how did we expect to get that message to the president, the reporter asked.

“Well, we are hoping the media might take notice and report it, “I replied.

“And just how do we choose one issue over another?” I continued. “Which is most important? The fact that our country is using torture? That we are supporting a dictator with both arms and dollars? That we are threatening to use a nuclear bomb on another country that is not a threat to the United States?”

These are only the most urgent foreign policy issues of the moment that threaten to create even more issues.

Under the current administration, issues crop up daily, crucial issues both foreign and domestic.

There are so many other issues it makes my head spin. At times I feel like I’m living in the twilight zone, or maybe a parallel universe.

Perhaps the reporter just defined the most pressing issue of the moment — the attitude of the so-called “liberal press” that the peace movement in Crawford, or anywhere for that matter, is irrelevant.

That was demonstrated the following weekend with the press’s lack of interest in a press conference and protest by about 40 average Americans.

Was it because we weren’t focusing on that week’s Western White House stage production issue of German Prime Minister Merkel’s visit to the Bush “ranch”?

I guess the 70 percent of average Americans who express unhappiness with our current government just aren’t relevant.

Kay Lucas of Moody is director of the Crawford Texas Peace House.

Syndicate content